2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 31157
MADRAS HIGH COURT
THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. – Appellant
Versus
M.RAMESH – Respondent
CMA 391 2021
C.M.A.No.391 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.10.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.391 of 2021
and
Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.2579 of 2021
The United India Insurance Co., Ltd.,
Micro Office, Sankaralinganar Street,
N.G.R.Road, Palladam.
... Appellant / 2nd Respondent
Vs.
1. M. Ramesh
2. R. Ramalakshmi
... Respondents / Claimants
3. Sri Venkatachalapathi Traders,
353, Kamaraj Road, Tirupur Town,
Tirupur District.
4. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
Coimbatore Division, Mettupalayam Road,
Coimbatore District.
... Respondent/Respondent
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Award and Decree dated 30.01.2018
made in M.C.O.P.No.191 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims
Tribunal, II Additional District Judge, Tirupur.
For Appellant
:
Mr. C.Paranthaman
For R1 & R2
:
Mr. Ma. P. Thangavel
1/12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.391 of 2021
For R2
:
Name Printed
JUDGMENT
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the second
respondent-Insurance Company, challenging the liability fixed on them to
pay the compensation as per the Award passed in M.C.O.P.No.191 of 2013,
dated 30.01.2018, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, II
Additional District Judge, Tirupur.
2. The parties are referred to herein according to their status
and ranking before the Tribunal.
3. The case of the claimant is that on 05.01.2013 the claimant
was riding his two-wheeler namely PULSAR bearing Registration No.TN
39 V 9372 on Tirupur to Palldam Road, at about 7.45 p.m., he was reached
near Amman Hallo Block at Karaiampudur, an unknown vehicle came
parallel to the deceased vehicle and to avoid accident with the parked
vehicle namely Mahindra Nission suddenly moved on the right hand side of
the road, which resulted in sudden stop of the Transport Corporation bus
2/12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.391 of 2021
bearing Registration No.TN 38 N 1675 in the middle of the road. Due to
sudden stop of the bus, the deceased two-wheeler dashed on the rear side of
the bus and that he sustained grievous injuries and thereafter, he succumbed
to the injuries. A criminal case was also registered in Crime No.21 of 2013,
under Sections 279 and 304(A) of IPC on the file of the Palladam Police
Station. The deceased was aged about 20 years and he was a manual worker
and that the dependants of the deceased have come forward to file Claim
Petition, claiming compensation of Rs.20,00,000/- and they have also
invoked under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act for claiming
compensation against the owner and insurer of the two-wheeler, in which
the deceased was travelled and also against the Transport Corporation bus.
4. The second respondent therein who is the insurer of the
Pulsar Bike in which, the deceased was travelled has filed counter and
contended that the deceased himself is a tortfeasor, he has driven the Pulsar
Bike in rash and negligent manner and hit on the bus and sustained injuries.
Hence, the Insurance Company of the Pulasar Bike is not liable to pay the
compensation. They have also contended that there is no valid insurance
policy of the Pulsar Bike and also there is no proper licence to drive the
3/12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.391 of 2021
vehicle. Hence prays to dismiss the claim petition.
5. The third respondent-Transport Corporation Bus has filed
counter and contended that the bus was not involved in the accident and it
has been falsely implicated in this case for the purpose of claiming
compensation. On 05.01.2013, the Transport Corporation Bus bearing
Registration No.TN 38 N 1675 was plied between Kinathukadavu to
Tirupur route at about 7.40 p.m., the vehicle was reached near Sulthanpet
which was 30 kms. away from the accident place, the bus was completed its
trip an