HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice R. SURESH KUMAR
The Inspector General of – Appellant
Versus
M/s.Sulochana Cotton Spinning – Respondent
Stamp Duty - Sale Certificate - Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Articles 18, 23 - Summary of provisions regarding stamp duty on Sale Certificates and relevant guidelines set forth by the court which determined that the appropriate stamp duty is 5% on the purchase money stated in the Sale Certificate, without reference to market value.
Fact of the Case:
The respondent purchased property via a public auction conducted by a bank and was issued a Sale Certificate. The registration authority demanded additional stamp duty based on market value, which the respondent disputed.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that only the purchase money stated in the Sale Certificate should be considered for calculating stamp duty, and not the market or guideline value. The demand for additional duties against the Sale Certificate was excessive.
Issues: Whether the stamp duty on the Sale Certificate should be charged based on the value mentioned in the certificate or the market value of the property?
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that stamp duty for a Sale Certificate issued under SARFAESI proceedings must be calculated solely on the purchase money stated in the Sale Certificate, referencing Articles 18 and 23 of the Stamp Act.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, upholding the lower court's order that enforced 5% stamp duty based on the purchase money only.
JUDGMENT
R.SURESH KUMAR, J This intra-Court appeal has arisen out of the order passed by the Writ Court, dated 08.08.2017 made in W.P.No.14315 of 2017.
2. The short facts, which are required to be noticed for the disposal of this appeal, reads thus:-
The respondent/writ petitioner purchased an immovable property to an extent of 9.49½ Acres comprised in various Survey Numbers of Veerapandi Village, Tiruppur South, Tiruppur District, in a public auction conducted by the State Bank of India under the SARFAESI proceedings, for a total Sale Consideration of Rs.18,36,00,000/-.
3. On completion of the said sale, by way of auction purchase, the Recovery Officer of the Bank had issued the Sale Certificate dated 16.09.2016 to the respondent. The respondent had presented the Sale Certificate for registration before the 4th appellant on 15.12.2016. Initially, the Sale Certificate was kept as a pending document in Doc.No.P.18/2016. Thereafter, it was registered as Doc.No.5392/2016 on 27.12.2016 by the 4th appellant. Even though it was registered, the document has not been released to the respondent and the 4th appellant has also passed an order dated 06.04.2017, where, the 4th appellant considered the sale taken place pursuant to the SARFAESI proceedings only as a conveyance and hence, as per
4. Challenging the said proceedings, dated 06.04.2017, issued by the
4th appellant, the respondent herein had approached the Writ Court and filed the said writ petition with a prayer to quash the same and to give a direction to the 4th appellant to release the document and to return back the excess of 3% of stamp duty collected by the 4th appellant for having registered the said document. That is how the Writ Petition came up before the Writ Court, which was considered and decided by the learned Judge through the impugned order dated 08.08.2017.
5. Questioning the said order passed by the learned Judge and in support of the present appeal Mr.B.Vijay, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the appellants would contend that, insofar as the registration sought for to the Sale Certificate issued by the bank authorities is concerned, since it is a conveyance or transfer of property by way of sale, the stamp duty as well as the registration charges as has been fixed by the provisions of the Stamp Act as well as the Registration Act, are to be collected.
6. In this context, he would further submit that, the stamp duty to be collected for such instrument to be registered is concerned, it must be on the basis of the rate fixed under
7. Elaborating his arguments, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the appellants would contend that, the stamp duty was originally 8% under
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.