SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 26500

MADRAS HIGH COURT
RAVICHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP BY – Respondent


Crl.OP.No.22189 of 2022

Crl.OP.No.22189 of 2022

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under

Sections 420 of I.P.C r/w 120 B of I.P.C in Cr.No.424 of 2022 on the file of

the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other

accused created some fabricated documents and obtained a decree

fraudulently. Subsequently based on the strength of the Court decree the

petitioner executed the sale deed in the name of other accused persons.

Thereafter, the said property was transferred to some third party who in turn

sold the same to the defacto complainant. Hence the case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that

a suit is pending on the file of O.S.No.390 of 2012 before the Principal

Subordinate Court. He further submits that the defacto complainant has

lodged this complaint after a lapse of more than 10 years. Hence, the

learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.OP.No.22189 of 2022

4. The learned counsel for the intervenor submits that the defacto

complainant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top