MADRAS HIGH COURT
RAVICHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP BY – Respondent
Crl.OP.No.22189 of 2022
Crl.OP.No.22189 of 2022
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under
Sections 420 of I.P.C r/w 120 B of I.P.C in Cr.No.424 of 2022 on the file of
the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other
accused created some fabricated documents and obtained a decree
fraudulently. Subsequently based on the strength of the Court decree the
petitioner executed the sale deed in the name of other accused persons.
Thereafter, the said property was transferred to some third party who in turn
sold the same to the defacto complainant. Hence the case.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that
a suit is pending on the file of O.S.No.390 of 2012 before the Principal
Subordinate Court. He further submits that the defacto complainant has
lodged this complaint after a lapse of more than 10 years. Hence, the
learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.22189 of 2022
4. The learned counsel for the intervenor submits that the defacto
complainant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.