SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 32859

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN
BALACHANDRAN @ BABU – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP. BY – Respondent


O R D E R

(This case has been heard through video conference)

The respondent police registered a case against the petitioners in Crime No.37 of 2013 for the offence under Section 498(A) and 494 of I.P.C. and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act.

2. After investigation, the respondent police laid a charge sheet before the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Hosur. After completing formalities and after framing charge, the learned Judicial Magistrate had taken the charge sheet on file in C.C.No. 20 of 2014 for the offence under Section 498-A, 494 of I.P.C. and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act. In order to substantiate the charge, on the side of prosecution, during trial, 7 witnesses were examined as P.W.s 1 to 7 and 4 documents were marked as Exhibits P1 to P4. The learned Judicial Magistrate after conclusion of trial, had found the 1st Petitioner/A1 guilty for the offence under Sec.498(A) I.P.C. and 494 I.P.C., 2nd petitioner/A2 was not found guilty for offence under Sec.494 I.P.C. and found guilty for the offence under Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 3rd petitioner/A3 was not found guilty for the offence under Section 498-A I.P.C. and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top