SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 51449

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Ms.Justice P.T.ASHA
TMT. FATHIMA BEEVI – Appellant
Versus
MR.SIKKANTHAR BADHUSHA – Respondent


ORDER

Aggrieved by the dismissal of her application to stay all further proceedings in RCOP No.09 of 2012 till disposal of O.S.No.110 of 2011, the revision petitioner before this Court.

2.The facts in brief are as follows:-

(i) The petitioner herein has filed the suit in O.S.No.110 of 2011 claiming partition of the suit schedule properties and to allot 2/8th share to her. She claimed the right as the widow of one of the son of Abdul Razak. Meanwhile, the respondent herein had filed RCOP No.9 of 2012 against the petitioner herein seeking eviction on the ground of wilful default, ceasing to occupy, owner's occupation and demolition and reconstruction.

(ii) The petitioner in the rent control proceedings had submitted that the property in question had been gifted by the Abdul Razak in favour of his son Ibram Ali under gift deed dated 09.03.2006. Ibram Ali had entered into rental agreement on 03.12.2007 with the petitioner herein. Thereafter, the said Ibram Ali had settled the property on his wife Paritha under settlement deed, dated 01.07.2008. Paritha in turn had executed the general power of attorney in favour of one Syed Masoodu on 05.01.2010 and the said Syed Masoodu as power agent of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top