Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
V.BHARATHIDASAN, R.PONGIAPPAN, JJ
Karuppasamy – Appellant
Versus
State Represented by The Inspector of Police, M.Pudhupatti Police Station, Virudhunagar District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of facts through the prosecution's evidence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's observations on the investigation and evidence. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 3. arguments presented by both sides regarding evidence. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 4. essential conditions for guilt in circumstantial evidence. (Para 15) |
| 5. final conclusion leading to acquittal. (Para 18) |
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.)
The appellant, a sole accused, in S.C.No.52 of 2015, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Mahila Court) Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur, stood charged and convicted for the offence under Section s 302 and 404 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo Life Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default to undergo one year Simple Imprisonment for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo Three years Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default to undergo six month Simple Imprisonment for the offence under Section 404 I.P.C. Challenging the aforesaid conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this Criminal Appeal.
2.The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:
The dec
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
