HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice S. VAIDYANATHAN
S.R.Anusuya – Appellant
Versus
The Director – Respondent
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed, to quash the proceedings made in Na.Ka.No.38519/VI/E2/2019, dated 06.11.2020 passed by the 2nd respondent and for a consequential direction to the respondents to promote the petitioner as computer instructor to teach computer science for classes 11 and 12 in higher secondary schools pursuant to the recommendations of the name of the petitioner by the 3rd respondent.
2. By consent of both sides, the orders are passed in the writ petition.
Mr.P.Raja, learned Government Advocate takes notice for respondents.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the relief sought for in the WMP No.3020 of 2021 shall be considered by the respondents and seeks direction to dispose of the same.
4. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents also have no objection to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 23.01.2019 and 25.09.2020, which is sought for in WMP, if they are not considered and disposed of earlier, after hearing the petitioner in person.
5. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side, this Court directs the 2nd r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.