SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 3055

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
CHINNATHAI – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent


ORDER

This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed to set-aside the order dated 05.03.2010 in Crl.M.P.No.62 of 2008 in S.C.No.313 of 2005 passed by the learned Additional District Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Court, Dharmapuri.

2.The petitioner is the defacto complainant in S.C.No.313 of 2005.

During the course of trial, the Additional District Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Court, Dharmapuri directed the respondent Police to trace out the Form 95, Seized Articles and Seizure Mahazars in respect of Crime No.313 of 2005 and to produce the case records. At this juncture, the petitioner has filed a petition in Crl.M.P.No.486 of 2010 before the trail Court to call for the case properties in respect of Crime No.313 of 2005 from the respondent Police. The trial Court by its order dated 05.03.2010 dismissed the petition on the ground that the case cannot be kept pending due to misplacement of the case records. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present revision petition.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the case properties viz., Form 95, seized articles and Seizure Mahazars in respect of Crime No.313 of 2005 were not available in the trial Court. Due to which the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top