SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 4344

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Ms. Justice P.T. ASHA
Aasife Biriyani (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Mr.Bhasitrahaman – Respondent


C O M M O N O R D E R

A common order is being passed in all the above applications.

2. The applicant has knocked the doors of this Court on the ground that the Franchisee appointed by him has not only failed to pay the Franchisee fee but has also created two trade marks similar in colour and appearance to that of the applicant.

3. Considering the fact that there has been a violation of the terms of the Franchise Agreement, the applicant has moved this Court for various orders of interim injunction.

4. The following are the reliefs that are being claimed by the applicant.

i) An interim injunction restraining the respondent, all his principal officers, staff, men, agent, servants, successors, assigns in business, representatives and any other person from infringing the registered trademark of the applicant having registration number 3768877,or any other word/words/logo/artistic work/device that are identical or deceptively similar to the said registered Trademark of the applicant in class 43 and thereby restraining the respondent from in any manner infringing the registered trademark of the applicant pending final adjudication of the disputes between the applicant and the respondent throu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top