SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 4183

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice S.S. SUNDAR
P.S.LAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER – Respondent


ORDER

The writ petition is filed for issuing a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the first respondent relating to the order issued in Na.Ka.No.A3/12464/2010 dated

16.08.2011 and quash the same.

2.The brief facts necessary for disposal of the writ petition are as follows:-

The petitioner claims tittle in respect of the lands in S.No.552/1, Chittalingamadam Village, S.No.1003, 109/1 Kunnathur Village and S.No.107/3, T.Kodiyur Village as legal heir of her husband who according to the petitioner inherited the same from his father. The petitioner and the contesting fourth respondent are close relatives. The petitioner admits that there was a partition deed executed on 05.10.1963 in Doc.No.2398 of 1963 among the son and daughter of one Thiru Arunachalam. The petitioner states that her father-in-law Thiru Srinivasan is one of the son of Thiru. Arunachalam and the fourth respondent is the daughter of Thiru.Arunachalam. However, it is contented by this petitioner that the said partition deed was not acted upon. It is the case of petitioner that the properties were divided subsequently by way of in oral partition whereby some of the properties alloted to he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top