SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 43850

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR
DHARMAR – Appellant
Versus
RATHINAVATHY @ NISHABANU – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.42 of 2020, dated 02.12.2021, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Aruppukkottai.

2. The gist of the plaint is as follows:

(a) Originally the suit property belonged to the plaintiff's grandfather Muthiah Kudumban. After the death of Muthiah Kudumban, the plaintiff's father – first defendant herein and his brothers Lakshmanan and Dhanushkodi had partitioned the property orally and in that oral partition, the suit property was allotted to the share of the first defendant. The first defendant had married the plaintiff's mother Packiam and their three male children had died in their young age. The plaintiff is the only remaining legal heir of the first defendant. The first defendant had left the plaintiff and her mother and was residing with one Parvathi, who is the wife of one Maruthu and her son Thayamuthu. As per the Hindu Succession Amendment Act, the plaintiff is entitled to get ½ share in the suit property. The plaintiff's husband is a Muslim and they had married on 25.03.1999. The second defendant is the friend of the first defendant. The plaintiff has sent a legal notice to the d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top