SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 37503

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Ms. Justice P.T. ASHA
SAVITHRI – Appellant
Versus
L.NAGARAJ – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

The plaintiff in the suit O.S.No.30 of 2006 filed for partition on the file of the Subordinate Court, Nilgiris, Udhagamandalam is the appellant before this Court.

2. The brief facts which have culminated in filing of the above appeal are herein below set out and the parties are referred to in the same litigative status as before the trial Court.

3. Before proceeding to discuss the facts of the case, it is necessary to just set out the genealogy for morefully appreciating the relationship amongst the parties.

Lingappa =

Maallamma(1st defendant)

| |

l l l l l l Savithri Nagaraj Lakshmi Prema Shantha Padma (plaintiff) (2nd defendant) (3rd defendant) (4th defendant) (5th defendant) (6th defendant)

Plaintiff's case:

4. It is the case of the plaintiff that the suit properties belonged to one Lingappa. The plaintiff is the daughter of Lingappa. The first defendant is the wife and defendants 2 to 6 are the children of the said Lingappa and the plaintiff's siblings. The suit properties were purchased by the said Lingappa out of the sale proceeds from the sale of the ancestral properties situate in Mandya, Karnataka. The said Lingappa died on 06.11.2004. On the death of the said Lingappa, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top