SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 37701

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR
M. Rajesh – Appellant
Versus
The Executive Officer – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.35 of 2019 dated 23.03.2022 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Kumbakonam.

2. The respondent/plaintiff, who is the Executive Officer of Arulmigu Someswarar Swamy Temple, Kumbakonam, has laid a suit in O.S.No.419 of 2014 against the appellant/defendant claiming the reliefs of permanent injunction restraining the appellant/defendant and his men from in any manner making permanent constructions so as to hide the tower of the Temple and for mandatory injunction directing the appellant/defendant to demolish the constructions made, in such a way, which hide the tower of the Temple.

3. The learned Principal District Munsif, after framing necessary issues, has proceeded with the trial, wherein, the respondent/plaintiff has examined two witnesses as P.W.1 and P.W.2 and exhibited seven documents as Ex.A.1 to Ex.A.7 and that the appellant/defendant has examined himself as D.W.1 and adduced no documentary evidence. The Advocate Commissioner's report and plan have been exhibited as Ex.C.1 and Ex.C.2.

4. The learned Principal District Munsif, upon considering the evidence, both oral and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top