SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 38703

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice D. KRISHNAKUMAR
State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
K.Manickam – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

(D.Krishnakumar, J.)

Aggrieved by the order passed by the writ court in W.P.No. 12410 of

2021, dated 26.02.2024, the present writ appeal has been filed by the appellant.

Brief facts:

2. The respondent/writ petitioner is an Ex-service man, was discharged from the Indian Air Force on 30.06.2000. Thereafter, he joined as Customer Relationship Associate in the appellant-bank on a basic pay of Rs.5200/- per month and retired from service on 30.04.2021. The appellant Bank has issued order on 23.03.2021 i.e before one month of his retirement, revising the pay fixation of the respondent from Rs.8400/- to Rs.7000/- w.e.f 03.03.2008. According to the appellant-bank, the said revision of pay th fixation was in accordance with the 9 Bipartite Settlement. Challenging the said order of the appellant-Bank, the respondent has filed a writ petition before this Court in W.P.No. 12410 of 2021. This Court by order dated 26.02.2024 allowed the said writ petition and directed the appellant-Bank to refund the recovery that has been so far made from the petitioner. Aggreived by the said order of the writ court, the present writ appeal has been filed by the appellant-Bank.

3. The learned counsel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top