HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mrs.Justice S.ANANTHI
A.MOHAMMED ASHIK – Appellant
Versus
N.PUSHPAM ALIAS PUSHPAVALLI – Respondent
ORDER
The revision has been filed to call for the records pertaining to CASR.No.4993, dated 03.08.2021 in O.S.No.207 of 2020 on the file of III Additional Subordinate Court, Madurai.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. Since the order going to be passed will not cause any prejudice to the rights of the respondent, no notice need be sent to the respondents.
4. On perusal of the records it is seen that CASR.No.4993 was filed for seeking a copy of “B” Diary extract from 24.04.2020 to till date, which was returned as “since the issues are not framed “B” Diary does not arise. When the petitioner represented the CASR on 25.08.2021, again it was returned as “it is a Judge Minutes will not be granted”. But, as per the settled legal position, a copy of the “B” diary can be given to the parties.
5. The petitioner in para 7 of the grounds of revision stated that for speed disposal he wants to file a direction petition before this Court and hence, he applied for a copy of “B” Diary extract. He further stated that since the matter is pending from 2020 and also building is in dilapidated condition and dangerous and unsafe condition, he seeks for speedy disposal. Both the return of CAS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.