SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 40734

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mrs.Justice S.ANANTHI
A.MOHAMMED ASHIK – Appellant
Versus
N.PUSHPAM ALIAS PUSHPAVALLI – Respondent


ORDER

The revision has been filed to call for the records pertaining to CASR.No.4993, dated 03.08.2021 in O.S.No.207 of 2020 on the file of III Additional Subordinate Court, Madurai.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. Since the order going to be passed will not cause any prejudice to the rights of the respondent, no notice need be sent to the respondents.

4. On perusal of the records it is seen that CASR.No.4993 was filed for seeking a copy of “B” Diary extract from 24.04.2020 to till date, which was returned as “since the issues are not framed “B” Diary does not arise. When the petitioner represented the CASR on 25.08.2021, again it was returned as “it is a Judge Minutes will not be granted”. But, as per the settled legal position, a copy of the “B” diary can be given to the parties.

5. The petitioner in para 7 of the grounds of revision stated that for speed disposal he wants to file a direction petition before this Court and hence, he applied for a copy of “B” Diary extract. He further stated that since the matter is pending from 2020 and also building is in dilapidated condition and dangerous and unsafe condition, he seeks for speedy disposal. Both the return of CAS

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top