HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI
Pachiyammal – Appellant
Versus
Raguvaran – Respondent
ORDER
This review application has been filed to review the order dated
16.11.2023 in Tr.C.M.P No. 80 of 2022 and set aside the condition of disposing off the HMOP No. 7 of 2023 in three months' time from
16.11.2023.
2. Heard both sides.
3. Admittedly, at the time of marriage i.e., on 01.02.2013, the petitioner was minor and she is uncle daughter of the respondent. Based on arrangement of the family members the petitioner married the respondent. Thereafter, due to misunderstanding arose between them and the petitioner left the matrimonial house and was living in her parent's house. Thereafter, she had affair with one Raja and married him. Now she begotten two child. The respondent also not denied that at the time of marriage the petitioner was minor and he has not taken steps to re-unite with the petitioner since because she had love affair with another man. Therefore, as pointed out by the petitioner's counsel the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent is void since because the petitioner was aged about 16 years at the time of marriage i.e., 01.03.2013. Therefore, the divorce petition filed by the respondent in HMOP No.7 of 2023 is pending before the Sub Court, Thiruvannama
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.