O R D E R

The petitioners have filed these revision petitions to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 22.11.2016 passed in S.C. No.1 of 2006 and S.C. No.

3 of 2005 respectively, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Panruti.

2. Heard, Mr. R. Gururaj, learned counsel for the revision petitioners and Mr. R. Parthasarathy, learned Counsel for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

3. The petitioners are the plaintiff in SC. No. 3 of 2005 and S.C.No.1 of 2006 on the file of District Munsiff Court, Panruti and both the plaintiffs are brothers.

4. The petitioners have filed a suit against the defendant / respondent praying for recovery of money with interest by contending that they have supplied Sugarcane to the defendant during the year 2002 to 2004. It is further contended that the defendant ought to have made the payment within 14 days from supplying of the sugarcane, but it was not complied with. Inspite of the oral representation, the defendant did not comply with the claim and therefore, they issued a notice, claiming interest for the delayed period. Therefore, the

2\7 suit was filed for recovery of interest for the delayed payment from the defendant/E.I