SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 12065

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice S.M. SUBRAMANIAM
N.Dandapani – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent


O R D E R

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the first respondent the 1st respondent to consider the Arbitration Application of the Petitioner dated 19.01.2023, under Section 24(1)(a) and 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, and pass an Award by enhancing the compensation in respect of the Impugned Award dated 14.12.2001 in Award No.7/ 2001, passed by the 4th respondent fixing the compensation of Rs.64,596 /-in respect of the lands of the Petitioner in Survey No.669/2 measuring Hec. 0.68.0 Ares (Acres 1.69 cents) classified as Dry Maanavarai Lands Type - II at panruti Village, B Block, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram Distrct, acquired for SIPCOT Industrial Complex, DATCIT Oragadam Scheme - Unit 3 and the basic compensation payable to the Petitioner may be fixed at Rs.25,61,61,547.20 P.(Rupees Twnety Five Crores Sixty- One Lakhs Sixty One Thousand Five Hundred and Forty-Seven Paise Twenty only) as per law within a time frame fixed by this Court.

2. It is not in dispute that the land belonging to the petitioner was acquired for public projects. The acquisition proceedings

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top