SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 3888

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
V.MUTHULAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
VENKATACHALAM – Respondent


ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the Order and decree dated 05.06.2021 made in I.A.No.292 of 2020 in O.S.No.79 of 2012 on the file of learned III Additional District Judge, Puducherry.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as "Plaintiffs" and "Defendants" as has been arrayed in the suit.

3. The Revision Petitioners are the Plaintiffs before the Trial Court.

They have filed the suit in O.S. No. 79 of 2012 on the file of the learned III Additional District Judge, Puducherry for the following reliefs:-

“a) Declaration that the Plaintiffs 2 and 3 are the only forced heirs of the first Defendant;

b) Declaration that the gratuitous dispositions made by the first Defendant are not binding on them and the first Defendant has no absolute right of transferring the properties in favour of others and such transfers if at all could be valid, can be valid only to the extent of 1/8th share as far as gratuitous dispositions are concerned;

c) Declaration that the first Plaintiff is entitled to ½ equal share of interest in the properties described in the “B” & “C” schedule of the Plaint;

d) Decree of Permanent Injunction restraining the Defendants 1 to

5 th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top