HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
P. Dhansabal, J
P. Balasubramanian – Appellant
Versus
The Executive Magistrate-Cum-Thasildar, Manamelkudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court observations on the necessity of evidence. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 2. reiteration of legal standards regarding evidentiary procedures. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. final ruling allowing the writ petition and remanding the case. (Para 11) |
O R D E R
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned final order issued by the respondent in R.C. No.5076/2024/A9, dated
13.02.2025.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is running a prawn farm in Survey Nos. 358/1, 358/2, 358/3 and 358/4, belong to the Thanjavur Chathiram Administration. Every year the petitioner is renewing the required permission without fail. The District Collector, Pudukottai issued a public notice instructing all prawn farms in Manalmelkudi and Avudaiyarkovil Taluks to register or renew their registration immediately. Immediately the petitioner submitted an application on 04.02.2025 along with necessary documents and the registration renewal process is in progress. Due to some previous enmity against the petitioner, a complaint was lodged to the respondents alleging that the prawn farm is causing sanitation issues in Raja Thoppu Village. Based on the false compl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.