HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J
Md.Basheeruddin Ahamed – Appellant
Versus
Dr.Shenaz Akther Saleem Begum – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments over the validity and terms of hiba. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court's findings on evidence and legal requirements for wills. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. appeal dismissed, confirming the trial court's ruling. (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT
Challenge has been made to the decree and judgment of the trial Court decreeing the suit for a preliminary decree declaring the rights of first and third plaintiffs to an extent of 1/7 and 2/7 shares respectively, in the present appeal by the second defendant.
2. The parties are arrayed as per their own ranking before the trial Court. 3. The suit has been filed by the plaintiffs for partition and separate possession. The suit property was originally owned by one Md Azizuddin, the father of the plaintiffs 1 and 3 and husband of the second plaintiff. The first and second defendants are sons of the said Azizuddin. The said Azizuddin died on 02.08.2006 leaving behind the plaintiffs and the first and second defendants as his legal heirs. After his demise, the plaintiffs and the defendants are in joint enjoyment of the property as co-owners. Due to difference of opinion between the plaintiffs and the defendants, they are not able to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.