SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J
Md.Basheeruddin Ahamed – Appellant
Versus
Dr.Shenaz Akther Saleem Begum – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.E.Sivanandan
For the Respondents:

Table of Content
1. arguments over the validity and terms of hiba. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
2. court's findings on evidence and legal requirements for wills. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. appeal dismissed, confirming the trial court's ruling. (Para 15)

JUDGMENT

Challenge has been made to the decree and judgment of the trial Court decreeing the suit for a preliminary decree declaring the rights of first and third plaintiffs to an extent of 1/7 and 2/7 shares respectively, in the present appeal by the second defendant.

2. The parties are arrayed as per their own ranking before the trial Court. 3. The suit has been filed by the plaintiffs for partition and separate possession. The suit property was originally owned by one Md Azizuddin, the father of the plaintiffs 1 and 3 and husband of the second plaintiff. The first and second defendants are sons of the said Azizuddin. The said Azizuddin died on 02.08.2006 leaving behind the plaintiffs and the first and second defendants as his legal heirs. After his demise, the plaintiffs and the defendants are in joint enjoyment of the property as co-owners. Due to difference of opinion between the plaintiffs and the defendants, they are not able to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top