AND R.POORNIMA , J .

The writ appeal is preferred against the order passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the application of the appellant seeking to award one mark.

2. The appellant participated in the selection process for the post of Physical Education Teacher conducted by the Teachers Recruitment Board. She secured 69 marks whereas the cut off marks for zone of consideration was 70 marks in the written test. For one particular question the tentative key answer was in favour of the writ petitioner. However, after receiving the objections the committee constituted by the Teachers Recruitment Board has changed the answer.

3. The contention of the writ petitioner/ appellant is that had they not changed the tentative key answer for that question she would have secured 70 marks and got eligible and the Expert Committee which has changed the tentative key answer had not given any opportunity to her.

4. The learned Single Judge after considering the fact has held that the Expert Committee after receiving objections to the tentative key answer had concluded that the correct answer is only (a) Paris and not (c) Los Angels. The writ petitioner has chosen the wrong answer, hence, she