Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
G.Jayachandran, R.Poornima, JJ
C.Thiripurasundari – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contestation of the marking process in educational assessments. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against the revision of the key answer and the implications of ambiguity. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. the authority of the expert committee in determining correct answers. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. judicial dismissal of the appeal based on lack of merit. (Para 10 , 11) |
AND R.POORNIMA , J .
The writ appeal is preferred against the order passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the application of the appellant seeking to award one mark.
2. The appellant participated in the selection process for the post of Physical Education Teacher conducted by the Teachers Recruitment Board. She secured 69 marks whereas the cut off marks for zone of consideration was 70 marks in the written test. For one particular question the tentative key answer was in favour of the writ petitioner. However, after receiving the objections the committee constituted by the Teachers Recruitment Board has changed the answer.
3. The contention of the writ petitioner/ appellant is that had they not changed the tentative key answer for that question she would have secured 70 marks and got eligible and the Expert Committee which has ch
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
