The court allowed the withdrawal of a petition under the Limitation Act and dismissed the Review Application as withdrawn.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.04.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.M.P.(MD)No.24761 of 2024 in REV.APLW(MD)SRNo.86413 of 2024 and REV.APLW(MD)SRNo.86413 of 2024 P.Mumtaj Begum ... Petitioner in both cases -vs-

1.Syed Ali Fathima

2.The District Collector/Monitoring Committee, Madurai District, Madurai.

3.The Block Development Officer, Madruai East Panchayat Union, Race Course Road, Madurai.

4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Y.Othakadai, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District.

5.The Panchayat President, Sakkimangalam Village Panchayat, Sakkimangalam, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondents in both cases Prayer : This Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 221 days in filing the above Review Application against the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.6335 of

2024, dated 15.03.2024.

Prayer: This Review Application is filed under Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 CPC to review the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.

6335 of 2024, dated 15.03.2024.

For Petitioner : Mr.H.Thayumanaswamy *****

ORDER

J. NISHA BANU and R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. Permission is granted.

2.Recording the submission as well as the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the Review Application is rejected at SR stage.