SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 21631

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
RAJIV SUBRAMANIAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP BY – Respondent


ORDER

This criminal original petition has been filed to quash the criminal proceedings in STC.No.164 of 2021 which is pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Tambaram taken cognizance for the offence under Section 59(1) of Food Safety and Standards Authority of India Act, 2006(hereinafter called as FSSAI).

2. The respondent filed private complaint as against the petitioners alleging that the respondent conducted inspection in the premises of the accused and found that the petitioners were selling 'chicken tikka'. On suspicion, the respondent had taken samples for test. Accordingly, the Form V A was issued to the petitioners and purchased 1 kg of chicken tikka for a sum of Rs.588/- for sampling. It was divided into four equal parts and duly packed as contemplated under Rule 2.4.1 Food Safety and Standards Rules, 2011 (hereinafter called as 'FSS Rules'). One sample was sent to Food Analyst and the remaining samples were sent to Designated Officer. After analysis, the Food Analyst, Salem sent report dated 20.11.2019 to the designated officer and it revealed that the sample declared as unsafe under Section 3 (1) (zz)(v) of FSS Act, 2006 (hereinafter called as 'Act'). I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top