SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 18746

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Satta Rajasekar@Rajasekaran – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police – Respondent


ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.569 of 2021 pending on the file of the first respondent.

2. On perusal of the First Information Report, it is seen that the defacto complainant's photograph has been published along with the photograph of the quarry owner, as if, she has a relationship and false news has been spread against her. Further reading of the statement recorded by the respondent police at the time of registering FIR, the defacto complainant states that there is one picture in which her photograph and the photograph of the quarry owner and there was a sentence written on it by stating that the quarry owner is forcing women into prostitution.

3. The FIR is of the year 2021. There is no interim order by this Court. When the matter came up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate(criminal side) would submit that in this case, even though the petitioner's mobile phone was seized, ultimately, it could not be opened up even by the forensic expert and therefore, at that stage, the investigation is kept pending. It can be seen that the allegation is that false news has been spread in the FIR. Therefore, nothing preven

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top