SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 19358

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice N.SATHISH KUMAR
Alageswari – Appellant
Versus
The District Registrar – Respondent


ORDER

Challenge has been made to the impugned order dated 07.06.2022, wherein, the District Registrar directed the entry to the effect that no further document should be registered on the basis of the settlement deed already registered in the year 2021.

2. A complaint has been given to the District Registrar by the third respondent to the effect that the 4th respondent has dealt with the shares of the property also in the gift deed executed in favour of his wife and one Raja Nandhini, who happened to be the daughter of the third respondent herein. It is his case that the property was purchased in the name of the 3rd and 4th respondent to an extent of 3 acres 91 cents.

However, the 4th respondent has executed a gift deed in respect of the entire land. Therefore, according to him, the transaction is a fraudulent transaction, whereas, the learned counsel contended that there was a family arrangement in the family. Though the property has been purchased in the name of two brothers, namely, the 3rd and 4th respondents, the property fell into the share of the 4th respondent and revenue records have also been mutated. Therefore, a gift deed came to be executed.

3. The learned counsel for the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top