SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 20532

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REP.BY – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram (Mahila Court), Salem, in S.C. No.201/2014, vide judgment dated 16.9.2021 is put in issue by the appellant by filing the present appeal.

2. The appellant was charged and tried for the offences u/s 366 and 376 (1) IPC and after trial, the court below found the appellant guilty of the offences u/s 366 and 376 (1) and convicted the appellant and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years together with a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year for the offence u/s 366 and for the offence u/s 376 (1) , the appellant was convicted and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years together with a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year. The sentences were ordered to run concurrently and the period of incarceration already suffered by the appellant was directed to be set off u/s 428 Cr.P.C. Aggrieved by the aforesaid conviction and sentence, the present appeal has been preferred by the appellant.

3. The short facts leading to the filing of the present appeal ar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top