JUDGMENT

The plaintiff has filed a suit as informa pauperies and for declaring that the second plaintiff is entitled to “A” schedule properties with a consequential relief directing the defendants 1 to 3 to pay “A” schedule property amount to the second plaintiff. Also to declaring that the second plaintiff is entitled to get job on compassionate ground in accordance to her educational qualification, with consequential mandatory injunction directing the defendants to provide job to the 2nd plaintiff. Declaring the 3rd plaintiff is entitled to “B” schedule property and consequentially directing defendants 1 to 3 to pay the “B” schedule property to the 3rd plaintiff. Finally, for declaring that the 1st plaintiff is entitled to “C” schedule property and consequently directing the defendants 1 to 3 to pay “C” schedule property.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the first plaintiff Vijaya is the wife of Pakkirisamy. According to Vijaya the marriage with Pakkirisamy took place in the year 1966 and they are blessed with three daughters namely, Latha (2nd plaintiff), Vanitha (5th defendant) and Sumathi (6th defendant). The 3rd plaintiff is the daughter of the 2nd plaintiff / Latha. In