HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
R.SAMBASIVAM – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB-REGISTRAR, – Respondent
ORDER
Though the petitioner seeks for a certiorari to cancel the Refusal Check Slip issued by the first respondent, on going through the impugned order, it is clear that the petitioner wants unilateral cancellation of the settlement deed. The settlement deed being a document of conveyance cannot be cancelled unilaterally. However, the petitioner is not without any recourse. 2. The allegation is that the second respondent, who is the son is not maintaining his father (petitioner). The remedy is available to the petitioner under the provisions of the Maintenance and Protection of Senior Citizens Act, 2002. He has already invoked the said provision by way of representation to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chennai Central on 07.01.2021. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the said representation is still pending without any progress. 4. Taking into consideration the overall circumstances of the case, this Court suo~motu impleads the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chennai Central as the third respondent to the writ petition. 5. Mrs.V.Yamunadevi, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the newly impleaded third respondent. She would submit that the petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.