SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 30544

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
R.SAMBASIVAM – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB-REGISTRAR, – Respondent


ORDER

Though the petitioner seeks for a certiorari to cancel the Refusal Check Slip issued by the first respondent, on going through the impugned order, it is clear that the petitioner wants unilateral cancellation of the settlement deed. The settlement deed being a document of conveyance cannot be cancelled unilaterally. However, the petitioner is not without any recourse. 2. The allegation is that the second respondent, who is the son is not maintaining his father (petitioner). The remedy is available to the petitioner under the provisions of the Maintenance and Protection of Senior Citizens Act, 2002. He has already invoked the said provision by way of representation to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chennai Central on 07.01.2021. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the said representation is still pending without any progress. 4. Taking into consideration the overall circumstances of the case, this Court suo~motu impleads the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chennai Central as the third respondent to the writ petition. 5. Mrs.V.Yamunadevi, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the newly impleaded third respondent. She would submit that the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top