SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 37755

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN
THANGAMARI @ THANGAMARIYAMMAL – Appellant
Versus
Home Prohibition and Excise Department – Respondent


O R D E R

The petitioner herein is a School Teacher. On a complaint given by the mother of 8 years old boy pursuing 3rd Standard, a case has been registered against the petitioner and two others for offence under Section 75 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and Section 3(1)(r) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

2. The sum and substance of the complaint is that the son of the complainant gone to the toilet, had not cleaned it properly. Therefore, he was asked to clean it. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has called the defacto complainant and advised her to teach clean bowel habits to her son. Being felt self insulted, the present complaint been given. The statement and witnesses been taken note by the Investigating Officer and final report filed.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a school teacher had only suggested the defacto complainant to teach her son about cleaning toilet habits, but, she has given a communal colour and exaggerated the incident out of proportion and given a complaint against the petitioner and two others who are sub Staffs working in the School.

4. On perusing the quash petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top