SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 27037

MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J
E.GEETHA HELAN ALEXANDRIA, – Appellant
Versus
THE JOINT SUB-REGISTRAR NO.II, – Respondent


ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The property in question belonged to one Kandasamy. It was allotted to him under a family partition held during the year 1966. The case of the second respondent is that he is also entitled to share in the property. Since according to him, it is an ancestral property, Kandasamy executed a Will dated 15.03.2017 bequeathing a portion of the property in favour of his son namely the second respondent herein. However, before his demise, Kandasamy plotted out the portion of the property and sold the same individually to the petitioners herein. The documents were registered on 12.10.2007. The copies of the sale deed have been enclosed as Document Nos.3 to 7 in the typed set of papers. Mutations were effected in the revenue records and the petitioners obtained individual patta.

3.While so, the second respondent herein entered into a sale agreement dated 24.07.2013 with his wife, namely, the third respondent herein. Since this document has cast cloud on the writ petitioners' title over the plots purchased by them, they want the same to be cancelled. Invoking Circular No.67 dated 03.11.2011, the petitioners submitted a representation before the f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top