SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 26891

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
THE MANAGER AND CORRESPONDENT – Appellant
Versus
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent
CRP(MD) 616 2023



C.R.P(MD).No.616 of 2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED : 08.03.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

C.R.P(MD).No.616 of 2023

and

CMP(MD)No.2839 of 2023

The Manager and Correspondent,

St.Joseph Higher Secondary School,

Punganoor,

Ramjee Nagar Post,

Trichy.

... Petitioner/Petitioner/1st Respondent

Vs.

1.New India Assurance Co., Ltd.,

represented by its Divisional Manager,

258B, Kamarajar Salai,

Madurai.

... Respondent/Respondent/2nd Respondent

2.Ravi

... Respondent/Respondent/Claim Petitioner

PRAYER:- This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of

the Constitution of India, to set aside the return endorsement passed in

I.A.No. Unnumbered of 2022 in MCOP.No.307 of 2011 dated 06.12.2022 on

the file of IV Additional Sub Judge, Madurai (Motor Accident Claims

Tribunal) and direct the Court below to number the I.A filed by the petitioner.

For petitioner : Mr.S.Chellapandian

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P(MD).No.616 of 2023

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the return

endorsement passed in I.A.No. Unnumbered of 2022 in MCOP.No.307 of

2011 dated 06.12.2022 on the file of IV Additional Sub Judge, Madurai

(Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) and direct the Court below to number the

I.A filed by the petitioner.

2.The specific case of the petitioner is that no notice was served on the

petitioner before the order passed in MCOP.No.307 of 2011 on 31.10.2013.

Only after the petition filed under Section 174 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

by the Insurance Company in I.A.No.473 of 2021, the petitioner came to

know that the petitioner had been set ex-parte without notice in MCOP.No.

307 of 2011.

3.It is submitted that the petitioner has a fair case to succeed.

Therefore, the unnumbered Interlocutory Application filed by the petitioner

to set aside the ex-parte order dated 31.10.2013, in MCOP.No.307 of 2011 is

deserves to be numbered. The petition has been returned by the Court on the

ground of limitation. In case, the petition is ordered, it is open for the

petitioner to file appropriate petition in accordance with law.

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P(MD).No.616 of 2023

4.Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of at the time of

admission without expressing any opinion on merits by directing the

IV Additional Sub Judge, Madurai (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal), to

number the unnumbered I.A.No........ of 2022 in MCOP.No.307 of 2011 filed

by the petitioner to set aside the ex-parte order dated 31.10.2013. It is

needless to say, the application shall be disposed of after perusing the records

as to whether the petitioner had wilfully remained ex-parte after service of

notice. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is

closed.

.

08.03.2023

NCC : Yes/No

Index : Yes/No

Internet:Yes/No

dss

To

1.The IV Additional Sub Judge,

Madurai (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal).

2.The Record Keeper,

V.R. Section,

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai.

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P(MD).No.616 of 2023

C.SARAVANAN,J.

dss

C.R.P(MD).No.616 of 2023

and

CMP(MD)No.2839 of 2023

08.03.2023

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top