SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 5960

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
M/S.POTHYS – Appellant
Versus
S.A.KUMAR – Respondent


O R D E R

The civil revision petition is filed challenging the order passed in I.A.No.505 of 2018 in O.S.No.290 of 2017 dated 07.11.2019 by the IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore whereby dismissed the petition filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of Civil Procedure Code seeking to reject the plaint filed by the plaintiff.

2. The revision petitioner is the 6th defendant and the auction purchaser of the property. The suit O.S.No.290 of 2017 was filed by the 1st respondent/plaintiff, thereafter I.A.No.505 of 2018 in O.S.No.290 of 2017 was filed by the revision petitioner/6th defendant to reject the plaint filed by the 1st respondent/plaintiff and the same was dismissed by the trial Court. Challenging the said order, the civil revision petition has been filed. I.A.No.505 of 2018 was filed to reject the plaint, since the suit is barred under SARFAESI Act. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that there was a sale agreement on 04.03.2009 between the 1st respondent/plaintiff and the respondents 2 to 5. The total sale consideration was a sum of Rs.2,34,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crores and Thirty Four Lakhs Only) out of which Rs.1.17 crores were paid and as per

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top