SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 17442

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
M.SATHYANARYANAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Respondent


O R D E R

The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner was appointed as Telephone Operator in the State Guest House in the year 1976 and subsequently promoted as Receptionist in the year 1982. These posts are coming under the Public (Protocol) Department of the Secretariat. Thereafter, the petitioner was promoted to the post of Liaison Officer in the year 2003. The main duty of the Liaison Officer is to attend the protocol duty of all V.V.I.P’s, V.I.P’s, Senior Officer etc. Sometimes, the Liaison Officer has to perform his duty continuously, without any break for 2 to 3 days.

2. It is pertinent to note that the post of Liaison Officer has always been equated with the post of Section Officer in the Secretariat and prior to the VI Pay Commission, both the posts have equal pay scale. However, the VI Pay Commission has not properly considered the issue of fixing the pay scales of the Liaison Officer and the Section Officer in its right perspective and recommended lower pay scale to the post of Liaison Officer. In regard to this, the petitioner has sent a request letter to the Joint Secretary to Government, Public (Protocol) Department to revise the scale of pay for the post of Liai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top