SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 4725

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Dr Justice ANITA SUMANTH
P.Selvarani – Appellant
Versus
The district collector – Respondent


O R D E R

Mr.Sundaram, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for R1 to R5 and is armed with instructions to proceed with the matter finally. Hence, by consent of both learned counsel, this Writ Petition is disposed finally even at the stage of admission.

2.The petitioner, a resident of No.50, 2nd cross street, Pudhu Nagar, Kuthalam, Nagapattinam – 609 801 objects to the erection and installation of a transmission tower being erected by the 7th respondent, Ascent Telecom Infrastructure Company.

3.The proposed site of the tower is in a portion of the land at Second Cross Street, Pudhu Nagar, Kuthalam and admeasures 523 sq.m. She also alleges that a structural stability certificate of the property and the tower has not been obtained as per the advisory guidelines issued by the Department of Telecommunication and State Governments.

4. That apart, she would also allege that the land in question is narrow and will not be able to bear the weight of the cell phone tower and as a result, there would be a possibility of adjoining buildings being affected detrimentally. She also points to the area being mixed in nature, including schools, commercial and residential buildings.

5. In all, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top