SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 31604

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
P.R.RAJASEHARAN – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN BANK – Respondent


ORDER

The suit has been filed for a declaration that the plaintiff was not bound by the encumbrances created by M/s.Ravishankar Industries Pvt.Ltd. the 10th defendant and the 1st defendant/Indian Bank with respect to the property mentioned in the schedule to the plaint which was the subject matter of O.A.No.375 of 1997 on the file of the Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Chennai and that the plaintiff is bonafide purchaser of the suit property and for a declaration that a compromise order dated 21.11.2000 passed in O.A.No.375 of 1997 has merged with DRC No.187 of 2001 on the file of the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Chennai and is invalid and for a declaration that the sale certificate issued in favour of the 3rd defendant by the Debt Recovery Officer, Chennai pursuant to DRC No.187 of 2001 dated 03.01.2007 is invalid and for a permanent injunction, restraining the first and third defendants from enforcing the rights derived pursuant to the sale certificate dated 03.01.2007 and for the costs of the suit.

2. Suit summons had been directed to the defendants and since they had not filed their written statements, they had been set ex-parte by an order dated 01.03.2021.

3. The plaintiff was thereaft

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top