SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 26214

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Dr Justice ANITA SUMANTH
M/s. JK Constructions – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Engineer – Respondent


O R D E R

Mr.Rajnish Pathiyil, learned Senior Panel Counsel accepts notice for the newly impleaded respondent (R5).

2. The petitioner is a contractor for National Highways and Public Works Department (PWD) of the State of Tamil Nadu. The issue in these writ petitions relates to liability to commercial taxes post the onset of Goods and Services tax, with effect from 01.07.2017, .

3.The contracts in respect of which the liability arise had admittedly been entered into on 17.04.2017, 16.04.2017 & 31.03.2017 in W.P.Nos.30891, 30894 & 30897 of 2019 respectively, W.P.Nos.30891 and 30897 of 2019 with the Highways department and W.P.No.30894 of 2019 with the PWD.

4. To ease transition from the era of Value Added Tax (VAT) to Goods and Service Tax (GST), and in the interests of clarity, the Finance Department has issued two Government Orders viz., one in G.O.Ms.No.264, Finance (Salaries) Department dated 15.09.2017 and the second in G.O.Ms.No.296, Finance (Salaries) Department dated 09.10.2017.

5.The aforesaid Government orders set out the methodology of computation of GST liability in respect of contracts executed prior to 01.07.2017 and make it clear that any difference in liability shall be m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top