O R D E R

The Writ of Mandamus has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to initiate disciplinary action against the 4th respondent and consequently, direct the respondents 1 and 2 respondents to pay a sum of Rs.10,00,000/-

(Rupees Ten Lakhs) compensation to the writ petitioner.

2. The petitioner states that herself and her husband are daily wage workers and she has two daughters and one son. Her son Yuvaraj, aged about 17 years was studying in Gudalur Government Higher Secondary School in 12th Standard. Her son was tortured and harassed by the School Headmaster / 4th respondent. The 4th respondent used to cut the hair of the boys in public, tear the trousers of her son and other boys by using the blade and beat the children ruthlessly and abuse them using filthy language. The petitioner states that her son was also subjected to such ill-treatment and on account of such continuous behaviour of the 4th respondent, the son of the petitioner committed suicide.

3. The petitioner has narrated various incidents in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition to establish that the 4th respondent has harassed the students studying in the School. The other students informed the petitioner that the Headmaster used to humiliate all the children and kept torturing the children inside the School. In respect of the suicide of the son of the petitioner, the Police registered a case in Crime No.533 of 2017 on

30.08.2017 under Section 174 Cr.P.C.

4. The grievance of the petitioner was that the Police had not proceeded with the investigation. No enquiry was conducted properly. The 4th respondent continued his activities in the school. Thus, the petitioner is constrained to move the present writ petition.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner mainly contended that the 4th respondent has committed an act of violation of the Right to Life of the son of the petitioner, who had committed suicide. The Right of Children even under the United Nations Conventions on Right to Child (UNCRC) has to be protected and if the 4th respondent is allowed to continue such activities, it would cause irreparable loss to the students community and therefore, appropriate actions are to be initiated against the 4th respondent.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that Section 17 of the Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 prohibits any kind of physical or mental harassment to a child in a school. It contemplates disciplinary action against a person, who violates the provision. Despite the said rules, the 3rd respondent has not initiated any action against the 4th respondent. Thus, the writ petition is to be considered.

7. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the official respondents 1 and 3 objected the said contentions raised on behalf of the writ petitioner by stating that the allegations raised by the petitioner are verified with the 4th respondent / Headmaster and on enquiry, they found that the 4th respondent / Headmaster used to maintain discipline amongst the children in the School. If any child failed to cut their hair, he used to pay from his pocket and asked them to cut the hair. At the outset, enquiry revealed that the 4th respondent maintained discipline in the School and consequently, the pass percentage in the School was increased from 45% to 90% during his tenure as Headmaster. The authorities conducted an elaborate enquiry pursuant to the orders of the Director of School Education, Chennai. The enquiry report submitted by the District Educational Officer, Gudalur on 09.09.2017 revealed that the allegations raised by the petitioner are incorrect.

8. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 3 contended that the petitioner's son joined in the Government Higher Secondary School, Gudalur, Nilgiris District in the 11th Standard class for the Academic Year 2016-2017. The Chief Educational Officer, also conducted an enquiry and given his enquiry report. As per th