SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 26664

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice D. KRISHNAKUMAR,Honourable Mr Justice R.VIJAYAKUMAR
S. USHARANI – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF TOWN – Respondent
WP(MD)/18367/2013



Land earmarked as colony road in a layout approved by the Town and Country Planning Authority cannot be converted into any other purpose.

Headnote:

LAND USE - COLONY ROAD - CONVERSION - WRIT PETITION - [Land earmarked as colony road in a layout approved by the Town and Country Planning Authority cannot be converted into any other purpose. A writ petition can be filed to prevent such conversion and to restore the road.]

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to restore a colony road that had been converted into a residential plot.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the patta granted in favor of the respondents 5 and 6 had been cancelled and restored to its original classification and the same is now maintained by the third respondent.

Issues: Whether the land earmarked as colony road in a layout approved by the Town and Country Planning Authority can be converted into any other purpose.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the land earmarked as colony road in a layout approved by the Town and Country Planning Authority cannot be converted into any other purpose.

Final Decision: The court closed the writ petition without costs.

W.P.(MD) No.18367 of 2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED : 09.01.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR

and

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

W.P.(MD) No.18367 of 2013

S.Usharani

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Commissioner of Town and

Country Planning Authority,

O/o. Commissioner of Town

and Country Planning,

807, Anna Salai, Chennai.

2.The District Collector,

Trichy District, Trichy.

3.The Commissioner,

Trichy Corporation,

Trichy District.

____________

Page 1 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD) No.18367 of 2013

4.The Deputy Director,

Town and Country Planning Authority,

Trichy Region, Trichy.

5.Sathak Abdul Kadher

6.Ayesha Naria

... Respondents

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a

Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents in any way converting the land

earmarked as colony road in the lay out approved by the 4th respondent in his

proceedings LPH/DTP54/70 revised LPH/DT66/63 into any other purposes and

consequentially to direct the respondent to restore the road after removing the

pillar and consequently to direct the respondents to cancel the patta granted in

respect of colony road in favour of respondents 5 &6 within the time that may be

stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner

:

Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar

for M/s.Ajmal Associates

For Respondents

:

Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam

Government Advocate for R1, R2 & R4

Mr.R.Baskaran

Standing Counsel for R3

____________

Page 2 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD) No.18367 of 2013

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.]

This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus,

forbearing the respondents in any way converting the land earmarked as colony

road in the layout approved by the 4th respondent in his proceedings

LPH/DTP54/70 revised LPH/DT66/63 into any other purposes and seeking for a

direction to the respondents to restore the road after removing the pillar and to

cancel the patta granted in respect of colony road in favour of fifth and sixth

respondents.

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned

Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1, 2 and 4 submitted that

patta granted infavour of the respondents 5 and 6 has been cancelled and

restored the same to its original classification and the same is now maintained by

the third respondent, which is not refuted by the learned counsel appearing for

the petitioner.

____________

Page 3 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD) No.18367 of 2013

3. Recording the aforesaid submission, this Writ Petition is closed. No

costs.

[D.K.K., J.] [R.V., J.]

09.01.2023

NCC

: Yes / No

Index

: Yes / No

vsm

____________

Page 4 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD) No.18367 of 2013

To

1.The Commissioner of Town and Country Planning Authority,

O/o. Commissioner of Town and Country Planning,

807, Anna Salai, Chennai.

2.The District Collector,

Trichy District, Trichy.

3.The Commissioner,

Trichy Corporation,

Trichy District.

4.The Deputy Director,

Town and Country Planning Authority,

Trichy Region, Trichy.

____________

Page 5 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD) No.18367 of 2013

D.KRISHNAKUMAR

, J.

and

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

vsm

W.P.(MD) No.18367 of 2013

09.01.2023

____________

Page 6 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top