SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 18199

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice N. SATHISH KUMAR
G.Bhavani – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Registrar – Respondent


ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 10.03.2023 made in RFL/Sulagiri/30/2023 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to register the sale deed dated 10.03.2023 submitted by the petitioner comprised in S.Nos.105/5D2 0.25 cents and 105/6B1 - 0.49 cents, in total 0.74 cents, situated at Dhoripalli Village, Sulagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District to the 4th respondent within the time stipulated by this Court.

2. Heard Mr.S.Vijayakumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.B.Vijay, learned Additional Government Pleader for the first respondent and Mr.K.Suresh, learned counsel for R2 & R3.

3. The impugned order has been passed mainly on the ground that since the agreement for sale was already registered, the property cannot be dealt later. This aspect has already been dealt by this Court in the case of N.Ramayee v Sub-Registrar [(2020) 6 CTC 697]. In the said judgment, this Court has held as follows:

"18. Conspectus of the various provisions referred above make it clear that the Registering Officer cannot go into the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top