SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 44195

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice S. VAIDYANATHAN
ASHOK LEYLAND FINANCE LTD. – Appellant
Versus
DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

S.VAIDYANATHAN, J.

AND C.SARAVANAN, J.

The assessee has filed this Tax Case Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as 'Act'] against the order dated 11.04.2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [hereinafter referred to as “Tribunal”] in I.T.A.Nos.78/Mds/2007.

2. By the common order dated 11.04.2008, I.T.A.No.78/Mds/2007 filed by the appellant was partly allowed and the appeal filed by the respondent Income Tax Department in I.T.A.No.564/Mds/2007 was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the assessee has filed this appeal. 3. This appeal was heard along T.C.A No.1025 of 2009. T.C.A No.

1025 of 2009 is being disposed by a separate order. The order impugned in the said appeal arises out of the conclusion arrived by the Tribunal in the impugned order of the Tribunal in this appeal. The present appeal is confined to issues answered against the appellant in I.T.A.No.78/Mds/2007 filed by the appellant.

4. At the time of admission, the following Substantial Questions of Law were framed:-

i. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the appellant is not entitled to deduction

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top