JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.]

The appellant is aggrieved by the order of the Writ Court, dated

18.08.2023, in and by which, the Writ Court disposed of the Writ Petition filed by the appellant, concluding that the mutation of revenue records in the names of all the legal heirs of original owner Poochiyayee is justified and leaving the civil rights of the parties open.

2. The land in question admittedly belong to one Poochiyayee. Her daughter Mariyayee sold the property to one Kannan and the said Kannan in turn sold the property to the appellant. When the appellant sought for mutation of the revenue records, one Maheswaran, claiming to be the brother of Mariyayee and one Punniyavathi, claiming to be daughter of Mariyayee, made claims before the revenue officials. While Maheswaran contended that the property belonged to Poochiyayee and as her son, he would be entitled to her share, Punniyavathi, the daughter of Mariyayee contended that she was not aware of the same. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukkottai, directed inclusion of names of all the legal heirs of Poochiyayee in the revenue records. This order was challenged by the appellant in the Writ Pe