SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 9397

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Munichamy – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police – Respondent


O R D E R

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to eschew/strike down the evidence of P.W.6/Latha, dated 04.02.2020 recorded in S.C.No.56 of 2017 by the learned Sessions Judge/Mahalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court) Sivagangai, Sivagangai District and also sought for a consequential direction to record the evidence as mandated under Section 119 of Indian Evidence Act. 2. The petitioner is accused No.1 facing trial in S.C.No.56 of

2017 before the learned Sessions Judge/Mahalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court) Sivagangai, Sivagangai District for the offence under Section 376 of IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution is that, Six months prior to

20.07.2016 the petitioner herein had committed rape upon P.W. 6/Latha/Victim who happened to be a mentally retarded girl and further averment is that the other accused had abused the mother of the victim when they had questioned the same. In this case, prosecution has so far examined seven witnesses out of them P.W.6/Latha/the victim was examined on 04.02.2020. The victim P.W.6/Latha after the alleged occurrence had stayed in the Home which is run by P.W.7/Sarala. During trial P.W.6/Latha has given evidence through sign langua

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top