SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 25328

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN
AKHILAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE REPRESENTED BY – Respondent


O R D E R

The petitioner herein is the husband of the complainant Suganya, is facing trial for the offence under Sections 498(A), 406, and 506(ii) of IPC before the Judicial Magistrate, Ambatur in CC No.40 of 2024.

2. The petitioner contends that the Defacto Complainant had given three complaints at various Police Stations and in fact, on a complaint given to the Avadi Police, she has taken back all her belongings and given a letter dated 26.06.2021 and withdrawn the complaint. While so, an earlier complaint dated 30.01.2021 was given to the All Women Police Station, Thirumangalam Police, being perused and a final report filed without taking note of the subsequent event.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that particularly, the petitioner and the Defacto complainant on 26.06.2021, having settled all the disputes and taken back all her belongings/articles, nothing survives in the complaint dated 30.01.2021. Further, he would submit that in respect of all other accused, the quash petition filed was allowed by this Court vide order dated 04.09.2023 in Criminal OP No.5645 of 2022 and same has to be extended to the petitioner herein.

4. The learned counsel app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top