HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
H.ANU VENKAT – Appellant
Versus
V.THANGAVEL – Respondent
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the docket order passed by the learned II Additional District Judge at Salem in OS.No.160 of 2016 dated 06.12.2017, thereby permitting the first respondent to mark unregistered and unstamped agreement dated
28.07.2014.
2. The first respondent filed suit for specific performance on the basis of the oral agreement confirmed by the receipt dated 28.07.2014. When the PW1's evidence, the first respondent while marking the unregistered receipt, possession and handing over agreement dated 28.07.2014, the petitioner objected the same. However, the court below permitted the said document to mark for collateral purpose but not to prove any right or title over the property. Aggrieved by the same, the present civil revision petition has been filed.
3. Mr.R.Jayaprakash, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that admittedly the said document is unregistered one and unstamped and as such it is inadmissible in evidence of the transaction affecting the immovable property. The said document is a xerox copy of the unregistered document and as such it cannot be received even for collateral purpose. There is no such transaction between the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.