SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 13319

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI
D.KARUPPAYEE AMMAL – Appellant
Versus
MADURAI TOWN – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side.

2.These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed against the orders passed in E.A.No.170 and 171 of 2019 in E.P.No.72 of 2015 in O.S.No.1580 of 2004 dated

01.10.2019 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Madurai Town.

3.The revision petitioner herein is the first defendant and the respondents herein are the plaintiffs in the suit. The respondents filed a suit in O.S.No.1580 of 2004 against the petitioner and the suit was decreed in favour of the respondents/plaintiffs. The plaintiffs filed a petition in E.P.No.72 of 2015 for delivery of possession. In that E.P., the first defendant filed an application in E.A.No.170 of 2019 to reopen the execution petition, which was reserved for orders. The first defendant filed an application in E.A.No.171 of 2019 to permit him to summon witnesses. But these petitions were dismissed by the trial Court. Against which, the petitioner herein has come forward with the revision petition.

4.A brief substance of E.A.Nos.170 and 171 of 2019 is as follows:

The respondents are not entitled for any kind of relief on the basis of a decree passed in O.S.No.1580 of 2004. Regarding the pet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top