J U D G M E N T

This Appeal Suit has been preferred challenging the judgment and decree passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Tiruchirappalli, dated 23.03.2018, made in O.S.No.99 of 2013. The appellants are the defendants.

2. The plaintiffs have filed the suit for the relief of declaration and consequential recovery of possession in respect of the suit property along with the mesne profits; the first plaintiff is an Indian Origin citizen of Malaysia; he is residing in Malaysia and doing business there; the second plaintiff is the maternal uncle of the first plaintiff and he is a permanent citizen of India and residing at Trichy; the second defendant is the son of the first defendant; the second plaintiff is well known to the first defendant’s husband in connection with some trade union activities; after the death of the first defendant’s husband, the second plaintiff introduced the second defendant to the first plaintiff at Malaysia and secured an employment for him at Malaysia; accordingly, the first plaintiff offered a job for the second defendant at Malaysia; the second defendant went to Malaysia in September 2005 and he was given with boarding and lodging at the ho