O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

The impugned order issued by the Bar Association, Tambaram against the writ petitioner is offending his basic right to practice law in Court premises.

2. Mr.G.Karthikeyan, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been suspended from the Bar Association merely because he attended the Court contrary to the decision taken by the Bar Association, Tambaram.

3. Boycott of Lawyers are dealt with by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in many Judgments and the Apex Court in an unequivocal terms held that one day boycott would be the last resort of any Bar Association and there cannot be any continuous boycott by Lawyers, which would affect the rights of the litigants and also the Justice Delivery System.

4. Mr.P.Santhaseelan, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the 2nd respondent would strenuously oppose by stating that the petitioner has abused the Members of the Bar Association and he is frequently causing inconvenience to the Members of the Bar Association. Thus, the decision taken by the Bar Association, Tambaram is on compelling circumstances.

Thus, the writ pet