Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
S.SRIMATHY, J
V.MURUGESAN – Appellant
Versus
V.MARIMUTHU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs filed o.s.no.611 of 2002 (Para 3) |
| 2. plaintiffs' claims regarding property (Para 4) |
| 3. details about plaintiffs and adoption (Para 5) |
| 4. background of the plaintiffs' family (Para 6) |
| 5. claims of the defendant (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 6. defendant's written statement (Para 10 , 11) |
| 7. defendant's denial of plaintiffs' claims (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 8. discussion on negative prayer (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 9. legal principles regarding negative prayers (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
JUDGMENT
The present Second Appeal is filed by the defendant in the suit to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 25.10.2016 passed in A.S.No.53 of 2015 by the VI Additional District Court, Madurai by reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 17.06.2015 passed in O.S. No.389 of 2008 by the III Additional Sub Court, Madurai.
2. The defendant is the appellant herein and the plaintiffs 2 & 3 are the respondents herein. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as plaintiffs and defendant as per the ranking in the suit.
3. The plaintiffs have filed O.S.No.611 of 2002 on the file of District Munsif Court, Madur
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
