MADRAS HIGH COURT
R. RAYAPPAN (DIED) – Appellant
Versus
RAJAMMAL (DIED) – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)
The defendants in O.S.No.66 of 2012, who had suffered a decree for partition and separate possession of the plaintiffs' 2/3rd share in the suit properties are on appeal.
2.Originally, the suit was laid by the three plaintiffs, who are daughters and grand daughters of Rangaiya Gowder @ Rangappa Gowder against his only son, his children and the tenants. The geneology is as follows:-
Rangappa Gowder @ Rangae Gowder (died)
S/o. late Kara Gowder |
____________________________________________________
| | | |
R.Rayappan Smt.Subby Smt.Rajammal Smt.Marammal (Ist Deft) Subbammal (died) (Ist Plaintiff) (died)
| |
_______________________________ ______________ | | | | | |
R.Ayyasamy Smt.Rojammal Manonmani Lalitha Padmavathy Padma (2nd Deft) (3rd Deft) (4th Deft) (2nd Plaintiff) (3rd Plaintiff)
(died)
|
__________________ | |
R.Velusamy V.Moorthy(P5)
(4th plaintiff) (5th plaintiff)
3.Upon the death of the 2nd plaintiff / Lalitha, her heirs were impleaded as plaintiffs 4 and 5. The plaintiffs would claim that the suit properties originally belonged to one Rangappa Gowder @ Rangae Gowder, son of Kara Gowder, who died before 1955 leaving behind
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.