SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 34871

MADRAS HIGH COURT
R. RAYAPPAN (DIED) – Appellant
Versus
RAJAMMAL (DIED) – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

(Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)

The defendants in O.S.No.66 of 2012, who had suffered a decree for partition and separate possession of the plaintiffs' 2/3rd share in the suit properties are on appeal.

2.Originally, the suit was laid by the three plaintiffs, who are daughters and grand daughters of Rangaiya Gowder @ Rangappa Gowder against his only son, his children and the tenants. The geneology is as follows:-

Rangappa Gowder @ Rangae Gowder (died)

S/o. late Kara Gowder |

____________________________________________________

| | | |

R.Rayappan Smt.Subby Smt.Rajammal Smt.Marammal (Ist Deft) Subbammal (died) (Ist Plaintiff) (died)

| |

_______________________________ ______________ | | | | | |

R.Ayyasamy Smt.Rojammal Manonmani Lalitha Padmavathy Padma (2nd Deft) (3rd Deft) (4th Deft) (2nd Plaintiff) (3rd Plaintiff)

(died)

|

__________________ | |

R.Velusamy V.Moorthy(P5)

(4th plaintiff) (5th plaintiff)

3.Upon the death of the 2nd plaintiff / Lalitha, her heirs were impleaded as plaintiffs 4 and 5. The plaintiffs would claim that the suit properties originally belonged to one Rangappa Gowder @ Rangae Gowder, son of Kara Gowder, who died before 1955 leaving behind

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top